Seeking Solutions

I’m seeking solutions to personal struggles that are shared broadly across the population and have national, and even international, repercussions, both now and well into the future.

Nearly half of all Americans reported being stressed in a 2014 poll, with most highly stressed (employed) people citing work as a source of stress. As a result, these individuals slept and exercised less, presumably resulting in poorer health and (I am guessing) contributing to the ballooning 36% obesity rate in this country (and associated rising total healthcare costs). Anecdotally, friends and family report that they constantly feel rushed and that they would prefer to spend more time with their spouses, children, parents, and other relatives. In China, there have even been legislative efforts to encourage children to visit their aging parents regularly. Clearly, free time for recovery, relaxation, and visiting loved ones is of supreme importance. Given that the OECD reports that full-time employees work over 40 hours per week on average, perhaps reclaiming some of that time is in order.

Rather than trying to avoid negative experiences and outcomes, what if we focus on nurturing positive ones? One could argue that we’re now living in an “innovation economy” where great ideas and insights are more important than clever mechanical inventions. Although certainly not a necessary precondition, “free” time, even at work (often with associated clarity and serendipity), has yielded many new ideas and products, even at established corporations. Could this be a model for the future?

On a national level, as a result of the Great Recession, unemployment and underemployment have come into sharp focus. A modest proposal to reduce the standard workweek (which is admittedly often exceeded) down to 35 hours a week could theoretically eliminate unemployment when the next recession hits. I also strongly suspect that employee turnover would diminish greatly with a little more leisure and a little less toil.

As automation’s “jobs death toll” rises, rapidly increasing productivity means that, barring massive expansions in “administrative” roles (however useful or useless) or creative pursuits (welcome, but difficult to grow), there may end up being fewer total hours of work required nationally. Take for example farm workers, where 61% fewer workers were required in 2012 as compared to 1954 even though total output increased nearly 2.5 times. Given that income inequality has been proposed as the “defining challenge of our time,” a broader distribution of working hours and wages is in order.

If income inequality is a defining challenge of our time, it is becoming increasingly certain (to most of us) that the defining challenge beyond our time will be combatting climate change. Green energy is a promising step in the right direction, but why not go to the heart of the matter and both reduce transportation needs by commuting less, as well as reducing the substantial ecological costs of manufacturing by just not buying so much stuff we don’t even have time to enjoy?

Obviously, I’m not alone in noticing that trading work for much needed leisure could help improve health, tighten social connections, boost creativity, reduce unemployment, spread wages more fairly, and combat climate change.

Part-time work is the solution I’ve been looking for.

 

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Seeking Solutions

  1. One of the biggest issues with PT work in the US is benefits. Healthcare being a biggy, but not the only thing, which many employers dont offer workers who don’t fit the mold of a traditional FT employee. Separating healthcare from employers would be a huge step forward to encourage the new “gig” economy I read so much about.

    I don’t pretend to have all the answers, nor am a I a socialist/collectivist, but healthcare has become a new third rail in American politics. This pretty much insures (no pun intended) the issue will not be resolved effectively in the near future.

    Like

    1. Yes, great point. My original, naive point of view was that, in the end, it’s just paper, i.e. you can make up for lack of benefits with some amount of money. Whether or not part-time work is still viable after accounting for the loss of benefits is another question.

      Unfortunately, though, with health insurance in the US, it sounds like you used to literally not be able to get insurance as an individual with a pre-existing condition. Currently, that’s not the case, but there’s so much uncertainty these days that it’s hard to make firm plans.

      Fairly crazy, considering I’ve seen estimates that 27% of adults (UNDER 65) technically have “pre-existing conditions” 😦

      Source: http://kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/pre-existing-conditions-and-medical-underwriting-in-the-individual-insurance-market-prior-to-the-aca/

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s